It’s not a secret that in the technology world, things change often and can get complicated. Therefore, being able to adapt quickly is important. Many systems nowadays use something called a RESTful API. This means one system asks another system for something and waits for an answer. But this way, the first system needs to already know about the second system and how to talk to it. This creates problems where systems depend on each other and have to work together a lot.
Event driven architecture changes this.
Instead of systems directly asking and waiting for each other, they use events. The main point is that event-driven architecture is helpful because it reduces how much systems rely on each other. This makes things less complicated, risky, and costly. It also saves time when we're creating, delivering, and running systems and services.
This article explores Event Driven Architecture—what it is, how it works, and why you should think about using it.
Let’s get started!
What is Event Driven Architecture?
Event-driven architecture (EDA) is a sophisticated software design pattern that centers around the seamless flow of events and the exchange of information among components within a system. In an event driven system, components communicate to facilitate the generation, detection, and effective handling of events, which encompass significant occurrences or alterations in state. This stands in contrast to conventional architectures, which adhere to a request-response model. The event driven architecture distinguishes itself by advocating for loose coupling and scalability. This is achieved by empowering components to asynchronously respond to events.
This decoupling grants enhanced flexibility, modularity, and extensibility to the system. Consequently, adapting and expanding the system becomes a smoother process, devoid of the need to navigate through cascading changes across the architecture. This architectural approach proves especially well-suited for intricate and dynamic systems where components must promptly respond to real-time events and adeptly manage scenarios demanding high throughput.
How Does Event Driven Architecture Work
If we dive into the concept of event-driven architecture, it's essential to understand the key participants shaping the overall architectural design.
Event Producer
The primary and pivotal figure in this context is the event producer. Whenever an event takes place, it unfailingly transpires within a system that generates a message, subsequently triggering an event. These event producers encompass applications or systems responsible for event generation, thus earning the moniker of event emitters. For instance, within the example under scrutiny, when an order is placed in an order management system, said system serves as the event producer. It propels a new event to appraise other systems about the freshly placed order.
Event Consumer
The second cornerstone in an event-driven architecture is the event consumer, also known as event subscribers. These entities encompass systems or applications keen on specific types of events. Imagine a scenario within a CRM system wherein customer information undergoes updates. The CRM system, as an event producer, generates a new event. In this context, systems such as a billing system, campaign management system, or other organizational components act as event consumers. Their objective is to assimilate information from the producer, process the event, and subsequently execute actions pertinent to their respective domains.
Event Broker
Furthermore, a vital participant surfaces as the event broker. Positioned between producers and consumers, the event broker orchestrates pivotal functions like routing, filtering, and error management. It also manages retry mechanisms and determines the event distribution strategy and prioritization. Depending on the scenario, this intermediary could manifest as a stream processor or a traditional event/message broker. Examples of this include Apache Kafka for stream processing and JMS, ActiveMQ, or RabbitMQ for message brokering.
How the Components Work Together
The event producer in event-driven architecture sends an event to a specific topic within the event broker. A commit log may be used in stream processing to record these events. Then there are multiple event customers expressing interest in the same event. Consider the application for real-time currency rate updates. The producer sends out currency conversion rates on a regular basis, and the subscribers retrieve this information for their separate operations. The beauty of this framework rests in the various interpretations and applications that each consumer may employ.
The event-driven model exhibits a remarkable decoupling effect. When an event is produced, it is published to the broker without imposing any synchronous constraints. The producer doesn't wait for specific consumers or their actions. The system remains asynchronous, facilitating producers to proceed with their tasks regardless of consumer actions. To enhance relevance, mechanisms can prioritize and accelerate certain messages.
Furthermore, this architecture supports a large number of consumers, even when certain consumers are temporarily unavailable because of ongoing tasks. Nonetheless, these elements are completely separate from the producer and the broker. The broker sits in the middle, receiving messages from producers on a constant basis and facilitating their consumption by interested consumers. In contrast to the traditional request-response paradigm, which requires clients to wait for responses, the event-driven method frees systems from this synchronous waiting. It defies the conventions of the traditional technique, avoiding the drawbacks that are usually connected with it.
What Are The Advantages of Event Driven Architecture
Let's dive into the advantages of event-driven architecture and explore why it's a smart choice for our solutions.
Decoupling for Independent Operations
One big plus is the way it separates the producers and consumers. These could be different systems or apps that work independently, without waiting for each other. There's no back-and-forth communication between them, so nothing gets stuck.
Scaling and Distribution
Another key highlight lies in the architecture's remarkable scalability and distribution capabilities. Think of it like setting up a bunch of team members – the brokers – in a group. Depending on what we're using and how things are set up, we can easily add or remove team members. It doesn't matter where everyone's sitting or what tools they're using. All that matters is that the producers connect to the broker using certain rules, and consumers can pick up messages from there. This flexibility lets us decide how spread out we want things to be.
Streamlined Communication
EDA enables real-time or near-real-time responsiveness, as components can react to events as soon as they occur. This is especially important in scenarios where timely reactions are crucial, such as in financial trading systems, IoT applications, and monitoring systems. Imagine in traditional setups, lots of data moves back and forth. But with event-driven systems, the messages only contain specific, important information. This means there's way less data traffic. Instead of the usual "I ask, you answer" way of doing things, here the producer sends out messages, and all the consumers who want to listen in just grab those messages.
Control and Customization
There's also a nifty feature that lets us control things better. If you think of messages like deliveries, we can set how important each one is. Some messages can be given priority, like express deliveries. And we can even say when a message should expire – kind of like setting an expiration date for something you order online. This way, we're in charge of how messages flow and how long they're valid, all through the message broker.
Versatility and Adaptability
One of the most crucial merits of event-driven architecture lies in its versatility and adaptability. The inherent event-based nature of the system equips it to effectively navigate unpredictable and nonlinear environments and circumstances, making it a preferred choice for handling such scenarios.
In a nutshell, event-driven architecture brings a bunch of benefits to the table. It keeps things separate and flexible, handles data efficiently, gives us more control, and makes our systems tougher when things get rough. It's a smart move for building reliable, adaptable solutions.
Limitations of Event Driven Architecture
Event-driven architecture does come with its share of drawbacks that you should be aware of.
The primary concern revolves around maintaining consistent data. When you use an event-driven setup, there's always a time gap between when an event is released and when consumers receive it. This is a trade-off you typically encounter. To manage this, you can minimize the delay by ensuring you have enough consumers capable of keeping up with the flow of events. However, if the consumers lag behind, the delay becomes more noticeable. Although usually in the range of milliseconds, delays can extend if consumers fall behind, impacting the user experience. This is termed "eventual consistency," meaning that the data will eventually match what's being published. But if not managed carefully, eventual consistency can create issues. For instance, in an e-commerce site, using an event-driven approach to update stock levels might let two people buy the last available item. Similarly, if tracking past orders, a user might not see their latest order due to consistency delays.
Another concern arises with duplicate messages. Event brokers keep checkpoints, but not for every single event due to performance reasons. If your service goes offline and restarts, it resumes receiving events from the last checkpoint, possibly including duplicates. Hence, consumers must be idempotent, able to handle the same event more than once using a unique ID associated with each event.
Lastly, event-driven architecture, like many systems designed for scalability, becomes notably intricate. The components increase, and additional infrastructure needs emerge. Debugging becomes more challenging when issues surface. All these downsides are essential to consider when contemplating an event-based approach. If scalability isn't currently a concern and isn't likely to be in the future, an event-driven architecture might not be the optimal solution.
Conclusion
Event-Driven Architecture (EDA) is a powerful approach that benefits modern software systems by efficiently managing event exchange between separate applications, microservices, and IoT devices. EDA triggers actions based on events, allowing real-time decision-making and improved operational efficiency. The architecture's popularity is rising due to its potential to drive innovation and streamline processes. Even though there are challenges, EDA's benefits outweigh limitations, proving valuable in critical decision-making, operational efficiency, and integration across industries like manufacturing and healthcare. Embracing EDA enables versatile applications, scalability, and resilient systems.
The Expertise of Solwey Consulting
At Solwey Consulting, we specialize in custom software development services, offering top-notch solutions to help businesses like yours achieve their growth objectives. With a deep understanding of technology, our team of experts excels in identifying and using the most effective tools for your needs, making us one of the top custom software development companies in Austin, TX.
Whether you need ecommerce development services or custom software consulting, our custom-tailored software solutions are designed to address your unique requirements. We are dedicated to providing you with the guidance and support you need to succeed in today's competitive marketplace.
If you have any questions about our services or are interested in learning more about how we can assist your business, we invite you to reach out to us. At Solwey Consulting, we are committed to helping you thrive in the digital landscape.
